Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

The Sad Tale of Roger and Barry

Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens were arguably the biggest stars in Major League Baseball in the 1990s.  Bonds was the best position player, Clemens the most dominant pitcher.  Their careers followed eerily similar paths, culminating today with what I expect will be the failure of both of them to garner enough votes from the Baseball  Writers of America to enter the Hall of Fame.  A dozen years ago their fate in this regard would have been unthinkable.

In 1985, Clemens debuted as a twenty-two year old pitcher for the Boston Red Sox.  The following season, Bonds became the starting center fielder for the Pittsburgh Pirates.  He moved to left field in 1987.  Clemens established himself as a star during that 1986 season, winning both the Cy Young and Most Valuable Player Awards with historically impressive statistics.  He won his second Cy Young Award in 1987, and a third in 1991.  Bonds took longer to find himself as a player, winning his first Most Valuable Player Award in 1990, but he won two more in 1992 and 1993, the latter with the San Francisco Giants.

By the late 1990s, both men were considered the best in the business, superstars who were destined for the Hall of Fame.  Clemens had added two more Cy Young Awards in 1997 and ‘98 to give him a total of five, more than any pitcher in history.  He had his MVP award and was also a seven time All-Star.  He was on pace to reach the milestones that defined excellence at his position -- three hundred career victories and three thousand strikeouts.  Bonds had won his three MVP awards, had been an All-Star eight times, a Gold Glove winner eight times, and Silver Slugger winner seven times.  He was on pace to reach five hundred home runs in his career -- at that time a near-automatic qualification for the Hall -- and was also on pace to wind up among baseball’s all-time leaders in runs scored and walks.

But at that point both men started down the path that would be their undoing.  Clemens, then in his late thirties, started to wear down, as aging pitchers do.  Bonds was still going strong, but his ego could not take the attention lavished on Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa in 1998, during their historic (and, as it turned out, steroid-induced) assault on Roger Maris’s single-season home run record.  By most accounts, it seems that both men turned to steroids in order to enhance their performances and prolong their careers.  And they did so with spectacular results.  Clemens, seeming to defy the passage of the years, won two more Cy Young Awards and finished his career with over 350 wins and over 4,600 strikeouts.  His seven Cy Young Awards is still a Major League record.

Bonds’s performance in the early 2000s is even more astonishing.  He broke the single-season and career home run records, amassing statistics that exceeded even those of Babe Ruth in his prime.  He won the Most Valuable Player Award in 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004, giving him seven for his career, more than any other player.  He finished his career as the Major League leader in home runs and walks, and among the career leaders in runs scored, runs batted in, extra base hits, on-base percentage, and slugging percentage.

And yet, the accomplishments of both men were so tainted by their rumored use of steroids that even these glittering credentials will not get them into the Hall of Fame.  Not this year, certainly, and perhaps not ever.

Clemens and Bonds were two sides of the same tarnished coin.  One white, the other black; one a pitcher, the other a position player; one (mostly) an American League player, the other solely a National Leaguer -- they seemed to have so little in common.  But they reached the Major Leagues within a year of each other, and both retired at the end of the 2007 season, Clemens with his seven Cy Youngs, Bonds with his seven MVPs.  They were both prickly personalities who were not terribly popular with their teammates or the media.  And when baseball’s reputation was damaged by revelations of steroid use, they were the two men at the center of the controversy.  Both have been in court in recent years, arguing desperately for their innocence, both seeming to understand that baseball’s greatest honor, election to the Hall of Fame, would be denied to them if they could not clear their names.  And both will be disappointed today when the Hall of Fame voting for this year is made public.

At a time when our nation -- indeed, our planet -- faces issues of near-existential proportion, when people are struggling to feed and clothe their families, when tragedies seem an everyday occurrence, it is hard to muster much sympathy for these men.  There are more like them -- men who might have thought they would make the Hall, only to discover that in violating the rules and the law in pursuit of gaudy numbers and gaudier contracts they had made themselves anathema to the writers who would decide their fates.  Palmeiro, McGwire, Sosa, Sheffield, Ramirez, perhaps Rodriguez in another few years.  The names are familiar, the stories now border on cliché.  All of them made millions playing a game.  As I say, it’s hard to feel sorry for them, or to see their fall into ignominy as any sort of calamity.

Theirs were sins of hubris, of greed, of vanity; the same foibles that have thwarted the ambitions of so many, in countless fields of endeavor, over the course of human history.  But what separates Clemens and Bonds from the other baseball players who used performance enhancing drugs -- an occurrence so common that the very category of substances now has its own acronym:  PEDs -- is that they didn’t need to do it.  Palmeiro and McGwire and Sosa were good players who made themselves great, hoping to find immortality.  But Clemens and Bonds were already great when they started to cheat.  They were destined to be in the Hall of Fame.  They would have been remembered as truly outstanding players.  And that wasn’t enough for them.

Maybe this disgusts you, or angers you, or leaves you shaking your head at their foolishness.  It leaves me sad, and nostalgic for the perhaps-imagined simplicity of my youth, when stars like Aaron and Mays, Bench and Morgan, Schmidt and Brett played the game by the rules, with respect for the traditions of which they were part.  Maybe that’s naïve.  After all, those guys were paid pretty well in their day.  But just as Paul Simon once wondered where Joe Dimaggio had gone, I wonder what has happened to the kind of stars I remember from my childhood.


( 8 comments — Leave a comment )
Jan. 10th, 2013 08:40 pm (UTC)
Even when a small number take the easy way, it makes it seem like everyone does. They don't.

Hopefully, their vote percentages will only diminish in the future until they, and Pete, are just a footnote in a Baseball Encyclopaedia...a very large asterisk...

Still, baseball has always had its fair share of jerks, phlianderers, drunks, racists, anti-semites...and many of those are in the Hall of Fame. Even so, all of that probably hindered their ability to play. This is different.

Heck, the NFL HoF has OJ Simpson but not Ray Guy.

Life ain't fair. Just read that the other day. :)

Jan. 11th, 2013 12:03 am (UTC)
Agreed, Hedwig. There was an interesting article at ESPN.com yesterday about this -- the writer was asking if we really do want to expunge all of these guys from the Hall and baseball history, or rather if we want to put them in the hall as their numbers warrant, but then make it clear why the 1990s were a dark time for the sport. In other words, instead of banishing the biggest stars of the era, put them in, but then expose them, and all of baseball, for the fraud that was perpetrated on the public. Interesting article. Not sure how I feel about it. Thanks for the comment.
Jan. 11th, 2013 03:18 am (UTC)
Interesting concept. But I'd prefer they go with a display section...very small...where they have a display that describes PED use in MLB during this period and then as a footnote at the bottom of the display that can have a list of names.

Look how cycling is handling Lance Armstrong. Is baseball less capable than a sport with the worst record for PED use?

I find this different than, say, Babe Ruth's drinking. Mantle as well. It certainly hurt their reputations AND shortened their careers. But in no way can I see that it gave them an unfair advantage while playing.

IOW, the question then becomes, and it's fairly easy to answer, would any of them have numbers that would put them in the Hall if they hadn't used these performance enhancing drugs.

That's a question I'd like to see their supporters explain.

Ever see a picture of Bonds before he left the Pirates? Think that guy could have hit that well without drugs?


Ok, he hit 33 one year in Pittsburgh. After he stopped, he
hit 26 and 28 home runs, respectively, to end his career in SF. Possible, but it's unlikely that a guy that hit maybe 400 home runs and may have hit .270 with 2200 hits and 1500 RBIs....maybe...but maybe he would have left the game after half a dozen seasons and worked for his dad somewhere.

That there's a question there that doesn't have a defintive answer (to me it is but maybe other can argue it) means they shouldn't go into the hall. Ever. IMO.
Jan. 11th, 2013 04:37 am (UTC)
Well, okay, I have to disagree with you about that last point. Bonds by ALL accounts didn't start juicing until the off-season between 1998 and 1999. By that time he had hit 46 homers in '93, 37 in the strike-shortened '94 season, 42 in '96, 40 in '97, and 37 in '98. At that point, he was 33 years old and already had 411 career homers. He was, at that point, a career .290 hitter and already had over 1200 RBI and over 1300 runs scored. He was still going strong and had at least four or five more productive years. He was absolutely going to reach 500, maybe even 550 homers, 1600 RBI, 1700 runs scored. He had, as I say in the post, already won 8 Gold Gloves, 7 Silver Sluggers, three MVPs. He had played in 8 All-Star games, and won the 1996 Home Run Derby. He was a jerk, and he cheated in a way that wildly inflated his career numbers, but he was a sure-fire Hall of Famer who was on his way to amassing some very impressive career numbers. He was arguably one of the top 3 leftfielders ever to play the game, behind only Williams and Musial, and quite comparable to Rickey Henderson only with more power. Yes, he bulked up after leaving the Pirates, but he was only 27 when he went to SF, and lots of guys bulk up later in their careers. So, agree with lots of what you've said here, but I don't agree at all with the notion that Bonds wasn't going to be a Hall of Fame caliber player without steroids. He absolutely was. So was Clemens. That's kind of the point of my post. Their stories are particular disturbing because they didn't need to cheat to be great. They did it anyway, but it was all hubris and greed and ego run amok.
Jan. 11th, 2013 06:03 pm (UTC)
I knew you'd call me on the Bonds numbers! :)

Yeah, he may have made it without juicing...which makes it even sadder. He would have made almost as much if not the same amount of money... Stupid.

"Their stories are particular disturbing because they didn't need to cheat to be great."


Edited at 2013-01-11 06:03 pm (UTC)
Jan. 10th, 2013 11:37 pm (UTC)

Thank you, David.
Jan. 11th, 2013 12:04 am (UTC)
Thank you. And by the way, I did go back in the correct the spelling of "paid". Sometimes I wonder how I ever got out of grade school . . .
Jan. 11th, 2013 06:04 pm (UTC)
At this point I blame all of my typos saying that I wasn't wearing my reading glasses.... :-)
( 8 comments — Leave a comment )


Australia, Ghost Gum
David B. Coe

Latest Month

September 2014


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner